Audi A6 2008 vs Volvo S80 2009

 
Audi A6
2008 - 2011
Volvo S80
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 240 HP285 HP
Torque: 500 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 seconds6.9 seconds
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A6 engine produces 45 HP less power than Volvo S80, but torque is 100 NM more than Volvo S80. Despite less power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.711.3
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A6 consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1190 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
1480 km on highway880 km on highway
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A5, Audi Q5Used also on Volvo XC60
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A6 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.93 m4.85 m
Width: 1.86 m1.89 m
Height: 1.46 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 546 litres480 litres
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A6 has 66 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo S80.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3402`290
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 62006200
Rating in user reviews: 9.1/10 9.8/10
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv