Audi A6 2008 vs Jaguar XF 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Audi A6 engine produces 85 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi A6 is smaller. Audi A6 is 3 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 19 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 546 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A6 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XF. The Jaguar XF may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.48 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.42 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`235 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |