Audi A6 2004 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A6 engine produces 7 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, but torque is 60 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Audi A6 has 4x4: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Phaeton | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 300C might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Audi A6 is smaller. Audi A6 is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 546 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A6 has 42 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. The Chrysler 300C may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`345 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |