Audi A6 1997 vs Volvo S80 2001

 
Audi A6
1997 - 2001
Volvo S80
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP163 HP
Torque: 235 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds9.8 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A6 engine produces 53 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1520 km on highway1370 km on highway
1160 km with real consumption1060 km with real consumption
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.82 m
Width: 1.81 m1.83 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 551 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1106 litres
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A6 has 111 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`070
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Volvo S80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S80, so Volvo S80 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 8.6/10
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv