Audi A6 1997 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi A6) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chrysler 300M) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. Audi A6 engine produces 144 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A6 consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 1160 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi A6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A6 is 20 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 551 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chrysler 300M may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`010 kg | 2`120 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 9.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |