Audi A6 1994 vs Volvo 850 1994

 
Audi A6
1994 - 1996
Volvo 850
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 101 HP126 HP
Torque: 157 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds11.7 seconds
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A6 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.38.9
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo 850 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Audi 100Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 850 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.67 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Audi A6 is larger.
Audi A6 is 13 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres445 litres
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A6 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 850.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8951`840
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Volvo 850 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo 850, so Volvo 850 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 16001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv