Audi A6 1994 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A6 engine produces 16 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A6 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi 100 | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Audi A6 is larger. Audi A6 is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity. Audi A6 has 58 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`895 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |