Audi A6 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004

 
Audi A6
2005 - 2008
Chrysler 300C
2004 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.1 Petrol3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 255 HP253 HP
Torque: 330 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds9.2 seconds
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A6 engine produces 2 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, but torque is 10 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.612.0
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A6 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres71 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway800 km on highway
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 360'000 km470'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 300C engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years12 years
Engine spread: Used also on Audi A4Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.93 m5.02 m
Width: 1.86 m1.88 m
Height: 1.46 m1.56 m
Audi A6 is smaller.
Audi A6 is 9 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 565 litres630 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1602 litres
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space.
Audi A6 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C.
Turning diameter: 12 meters12 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2702`355
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 40005000
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Chrysler 300C has
  • timing belt engine
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv