Audi A6 2000 vs BMW 3 series 2000
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 370 NM | 390 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi A6 engine produces 4 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Audi A6 1998: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. BMW 3 sērija 1998: 38% front and 62% rear torque distribution via planetary gears. ADB-X (Automatic Differential Brake) electronic traction control system provides differential locking functions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A8 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
Audi A6 is larger. Audi A6 is 33 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 440 litres | |
Audi A6 has 15 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 1.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`120 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |