Audi A6 2001 vs Volvo S80 2000

 
Audi A6
2001 - 2001
Volvo S80
2000 - 2003
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP200 HP
Torque: 230 NM285 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds7.9 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A6 engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.79.3
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A6 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway1110 km on highway
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.82 m
Width: 1.81 m1.83 m
Height: 1.48 m1.43 m
Audi A6 is smaller, but higher.
Audi A6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1126 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A6 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1352`050
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Volvo S80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S80, so Volvo S80 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 8.6/10
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S80 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    • higher safety
    • fewer faults
    • higher ratings in user reviews
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv