Audi A6 1994 vs Volvo V70 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A6 engine produces 36 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A6 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi 80, Audi 100, Audi Coupe | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi A6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.51 m | |
| Audi A6 is 9 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi A6 has 95 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Audi A6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |