Audi A6 1994 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Audi A6 engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Mitsubishi Galant. Despite the higher power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A6 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi A6 is larger. Audi A6 is 17 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi A6 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. This could mean that the Audi A6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |