Audi A6 1994 vs Mazda 626 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A6 engine produces 60 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A6 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi A6 is larger. Audi A6 is 21 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1315 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi A6 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Audi A6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |