Audi A6 1994 vs Volvo 850 1993

 
Audi A6
1994 - 1997
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP170 HP
Torque: 265 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds10.5 seconds
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A6 engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo 850, but torque is 45 NM more than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.99.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A6 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1190 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 770'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Audi 100Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 850 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.71 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Audi A6 is larger.
Audi A6 is 9 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0601`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Volvo 850 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A6, so Volvo 850 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 1400600
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv