Audi A6 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A6 engine produces 106 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A6 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1530 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1730 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A7 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi A6 is smaller. Audi A6 is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 540 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Audi A6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`475 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`825 kg | 1`659 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 650 kg | 591 kg | |
| Audi A6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Audi A6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |