Audi A6 2018 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A6 engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V90. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi A6 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A6 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 and Volvo V90 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1526 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi A6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |