Audi A6 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A6 engine produces 41 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Audi A6 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi Q5, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 565 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`425 kg | 2`260 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`678 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 655 kg | 582 kg | |
| Audi A6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Audi A6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |
