Audi A6 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Audi A6 and Jaguar XF have the same engine power, but Audi A6 torque is 10 NM less than Jaguar XF. Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
| Audi A6 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1460 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 565 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`330 kg | 2`260 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`710 kg | 1`678 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 620 kg | 582 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |