Audi A6 2001 vs Volvo S80 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 4.2 | 2.4 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 - 300 HP | 130 - 272 HP | |
Torque: | 195 - 400 NM | 192 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 11.1 seconds | 7.2 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 13.0 | 6.5 - 13.0 | |
Audi A6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80. On average, Audi A6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 551 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A6 has 111 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Audi A6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`127 | ~ 2`507 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |