Audi A4 2004 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Diesel (Audi A4) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (SAAB 9-3) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 175 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Audi A4 engine produces 35 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, but torque is 55 NM more than SAAB 9-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
The Audi A4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A4 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Audi A4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A4 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
1550 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
1020 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 400'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A3 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
SAAB 9-3 2002 2.0 engine: The B207 engine is primarily installed in Saab vehicles, with its Opel equivalent being the Z20NET, used in the Vectra C. The engine features an aluminum alloy block with cast iron liners and a chain-driven timing system without variable valve timing. A distinctive feature is ... More about SAAB 9-3 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
Audi A4 is 5 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi A4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
833 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A4 is 0.3 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |