Audi A4 2001 vs Mercedes C class 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. Audi A4 engine produces 41 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Audi A4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A4 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Audi A4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A4 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Seat Exeo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes C klase 2002 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes C klase 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.55 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Audi A4 is larger. Audi A4 is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A4 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Audi A4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi A4, so Audi A4 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |