Audi A4 1999 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving. Audi A4 engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that by driving the Audi A4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi A4 and Mitsubishi Carisma are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 460 litres | |
| Audi A4 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A4 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Audi A4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A4 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |