Audi A4 1998 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A4 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A4 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A4 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A4 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Audi A4 is smaller. Audi A4 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A4 is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1250 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Audi A4 has 105 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 205 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A4 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Audi A4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`980 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 7400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |