Audi A4 1996 vs Volkswagen Touran 2003
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 155 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Audi A4 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A4 engine produces 34 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Thanks to more power Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A4 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A4 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A4 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A4 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Audi A4 1996 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. Volkswagen Touran 2003 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.65 m | |
Audi A4 is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A4 is 23 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1989 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A4 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A4 has serious deffects in 205 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |