Audi A4 2019 vs BMW 4 series 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi A4) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (BMW 4 series) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi A4 engine produces 102 HP less power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 80 NM less than BMW 4 series. Due to the lower power, Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 10.40 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A4) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Audi A4 is larger. Audi A4 is 12 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A4 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 480 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Audi A4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A4 is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`035 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 33 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |