Audi A4 2019 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi A4) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Jaguar XF) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Audi A4 engine produces 60 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 14.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A4) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A3, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Audi A4 is smaller. Audi A4 is 19 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1495 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Audi A4 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`510 kg | 1`700 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 605 kg | 590 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |