Audi A4 2019 vs BMW 3 series 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 258 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi A4 engine produces 68 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 80 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Audi A4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi A4 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A4 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A4 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 320'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A3, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 6 sērija, BMW Z4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A4 is 5 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
Audi A4 has 5 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`115 | 2`185 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Audi A4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A4, so Audi A4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 25 600 | 23 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |