Audi A4 2019 vs Mazda 6 2018

 
Audi A4
2019 -
Mazda 6
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 seconds9.2 seconds
Audi A4 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A4 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Audi A4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.34.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A4 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A4 could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A4 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1370 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1510 km on highway
840 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.80 m
Width: 1.85 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.48 m
Audi A4 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A4 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres522 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1664 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Audi A4 has 27 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2302`189
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Audi A4 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A4, so Audi A4 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 30 20022 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A4 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv