Audi A3 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005

 
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Nissan X-Trail
2005 - 2006
Body: CabrioCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 140 HP136 HP
Torque: 320 NM314 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds11.2 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.67.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway890 km on highway
850 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan X-Trail engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen SharanInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.51 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.75 m
Audi A3 is 27 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 33 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
674 litres1841 litres
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space.
Audi A3 has 150 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1167 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9952`050
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 290 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 62002600
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Nissan X-Trail has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv