Audi A3 2008 vs Mazda MX-5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 engine produces 21 HP less power than Mazda MX-5, but torque is 132 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A3 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
674 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |