Audi A3 2008 vs Volvo C70 2006

 
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Volvo C70
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP180 HP
Torque: 320 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo C70 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo C70. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.37.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1060 km on highway
930 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.82 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Audi A3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Audi A3 is 34 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
674 litres404 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 270 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 2 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Audi A3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9752`090
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 62005600
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volvo C70 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv