Audi A3 2008 vs Volvo C70 2009

 
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Volvo C70
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP136 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds11 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo C70, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.36.3
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A3 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway980 km on highway
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.62 m
Width: 1.76 m1.84 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Audi A3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Audi A3 is 38 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
674 litresno data
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Audi A3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9752`130
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 620010 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv