Audi A3 2008 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006

 
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Volkswagen EOS
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 140 HP200 HP
Torque: 320 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds7.9 seconds
Volkswagen EOS is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 engine produces 60 HP less power than Volkswagen EOS, but torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen EOS. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.38.2
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway840 km on highway
930 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen SharanUsed also on Volkswagen Jetta
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.41 m
Width: 1.76 m1.79 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 17 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
674 litres380 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The Volkswagen EOS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 294 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen EOS.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9752`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen EOS has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 62005600
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen EOS has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv