Audi A3 2008 vs Mazda MX-5 2009

 
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Mazda MX-5
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 140 HP160 HP
Torque: 320 NM188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds7.6 seconds
Mazda MX-5 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda MX-5, but torque is 132 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.37.6
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway840 km on highway
930 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen SharanInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.02 m
Width: 1.76 m1.72 m
Height: 1.42 m1.26 m
Audi A3 is larger.
Audi A3 is 22 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 17 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres150 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
674 litresno data
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A3 has 110 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9751`375
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 6200no data
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Mazda MX-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv