Audi A3 2008 vs BMW 3 series 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 engine produces 91 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 180 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A3 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
930 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
Audi A3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A3 is 34 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 210 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
674 litres | 350 litres | |
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 50 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 324 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 2`195 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6200 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |