Audi A3 2013 vs Volvo S60 2013

 
Audi A3
2013 - 2016
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP163 HP
Torque: 320 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.2 seconds
Audi A3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo S60. Despite less power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.8
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1390 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway1630 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.63 m
Width: 1.80 m1.87 m
Height: 1.42 m1.48 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 17 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
880 litres1749 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 869 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi A3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`870 kg2`110 kg
Net weight:1`320 kg1`667 kg
Load capacity:550 kg443 kg
Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Audi A3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo S60, so Audi A3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10 2009000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv