Audi A3 2013 vs Honda Civic 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A3 engine produces 18 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 25 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A3 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Yeti | Used also on Honda FR-V | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Audi A3 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. Honda Civic 2012 1.8 engine: The engine is demanding on the quality of petrol and oil used. Use of poor quality fuel can lead to repairs of the lambda sensor and catalytic converter. The chain tensioner and the engine cushions have a ... More about Honda Civic 2012 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.31 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 1 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 477 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1220 litres | no data | |
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi A3 has 97 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Audi A3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.08 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.18 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Honda Civic scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9400 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |