Audi A3 2008 vs Volvo V40 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 engine produces 45 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
1300 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
1000 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Audi A3 is smaller. Audi A3 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1120 litres | no data | |
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Audi A3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`895 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | |||
Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6200 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |