Audi A3 2008 vs Chevrolet Lacetti 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A3 engine produces 51 HP more power than Chevrolet Lacetti, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Chevrolet Lacetti. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Lacetti, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Lacetti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Audi A3 is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Lacetti, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1104 litres | 1045 litres | |
|
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chevrolet Lacetti may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Lacetti. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`175 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 475 kg | |
| Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Chevrolet Lacetti. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Chevrolet Lacetti has
| |