Audi A3 2002 vs Audi A3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 2002 engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi A3 2006, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi A3 2006. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.5 | |
|
The Audi A3 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A3 2002 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 2002 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A3 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A3 2002 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Audi A3 2002 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A3 2002 is 14 cm shorter than the Audi A3 2006, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 2002 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
| Audi A3 2002 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 2002 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A3 2006. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi A3 2006 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 2002 has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Audi A3 2006, so Audi A3 2006 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |