Audi A3 1996 vs Audi A3 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 202 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Audi A3 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 1996 engine produces 40 HP less power than Audi A3 2000, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Audi A3 2000. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Audi A3 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A3 1996 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3 2000, which means that by driving the Audi A3 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 1996 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3 2000. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
1170 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
930 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 1996 and Audi A3 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1110 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`805 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |