Audi A3 2024 vs Nissan X-Trail 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi A3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan X-Trail) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 244 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi A3 engine produces 34 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 116 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Audi A3 is smaller. Audi A3 is 33 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1200 litres | 1400 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Audi A3 has 195 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`960 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |