Audi A3 2024 vs Nissan Juke 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi A3) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Nissan Juke) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A3 engine produces 56 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2024 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Audi A3 is larger, but lower. Audi A3 is 14 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1200 litres | 1237 litres | |
| Audi A3 has 26 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`810 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`350 kg | 1`330 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 480 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |