Audi A3 2024 vs Nissan X-Trail 2022
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi A3) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Nissan X-Trail) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Audi A3 engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite less power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 14.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Audi A3 is smaller. Audi A3 is 33 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 380 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1200 litres | 1298 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 195 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 2`285 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`350 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 645 kg | |
| Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |