Audi A3 2024 vs Hyundai Kona 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi A3) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Hyundai Kona) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Audi A3 engine produces 48 HP less power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Hyundai Kona. Despite less power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 0.4 l/100km + 15.5 kWh/100km | =LNG_NAV_DATU?> | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 47 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Audi A3 is smaller. Audi A3 and Hyundai Kona are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 466 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1100 litres | 1300 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Audi A3 has 186 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Kona, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`095 kg | 1`915 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`610 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 555 kg | |
| Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Hyundai Kona. Therefore, Hyundai Kona is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |
