Audi A3 2025 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Audi A3
2025 -
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 204 HP186 HP
Torque: 320 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 seconds8.5 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 18 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.25.7
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A3 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.66 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Audi A3 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1138 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Audi A3 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`985 kg1`959 kg
Net weight:1`455 kg1`394 kg
Load capacity:530 kg565 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 32 40014 800
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv