Audi A3 2021 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Audi A3
2021 - 2024
Mazda 3
2019 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP186 HP
Torque: 320 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 seconds8.9 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.5
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A3 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.46 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1026 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A3 has 39 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`005 kg2`013 kg
Net weight:1`465 kg1`409 kg
Load capacity:540 kg604 kg
Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 29 80021 200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv