Audi A3 2021 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Audi A3
2021 - 2024
Mazda 3
2019 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM213 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 seconds9.3 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 107 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.9
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mazda 3 2019 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 3 2019 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.46 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1019 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A3 has 95 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`005no data
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 29 80023 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv