Audi A3 2020 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.7 | |
|
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Seat Leon, Audi A1 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A3 2020 1.0 engine: The VW DLAA 1.0 TSI is a three-cylinder turbocharged gasoline engine produced at Volkswagen’s Czech plant from 2020 to 2024. It was later discontinued after stricter Euro 6e emissions requirements came into ... More about Audi A3 2020 1.0 engine Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi A3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A3 is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1200 litres | 1258 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Audi A3 has 22 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`801 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`220 kg | 1`185 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 616 kg | |
| Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |