Audi A3 2020 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Audi A3
2020 - 2024
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP120 HP
Torque: 200 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds11.3 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 50 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1010 km on highway
750 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.46 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1200 litres1019 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 181 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`770 kgno data
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 28 80021 200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv